Which magazine first published photos of a human embryo in 1965?

incredible. all we have learned from his photos.

Here's the deal: In this day & age, to avoid being dull & unremarkable, any trivia game worth its salt must present some questions that are controversial. The designers of this game chose to do something unique, creative, & thought provoking. That being, allow players the ability to comment on & critique, not only the questions; but also respond to the remarks of other players. I think it's a fun & extraordinary twist on an otherwise ordinary pursuit.

me, those lives are not prospective, they're already there. They ARE actual people. The only difference is their place of residence.

one may want to stop imposing their views on another while chastising another for doing the same.

me, Unborn babies are not "prospective lives," they are tiny helpless human lives. You are not being honest to say that they have less value that a child who has been born. Women do have a choice and do have rights, they maybe should choose to use birth control to prevent pregnancy in the first place. Terminating a life because it was unplanned or is inconvenient is not a good argument. Visit the NICU at your local hospital and then tell us that a tiny infant is not a baby. I'm a neonatologist and have seen first hand that a pre-term infant is a human life.

Player #765951, I vividly recall seeing these astounding photos in Life magazine.

Mimi3748, what does that have to do with anything it's a game not a platform for political agenda

phoenixrising473, you are sooo right! After conception it’s a life. Don’t murder!

I was 9 years old and poured over those pictures for hours. It was just utterly amazing.

me, koodoos to you! my sentiments exactly!

me, saving existing lives and saving prospective lives do not have to be mutually exclusive.

phoenixrising473, Agreed